Can an increase in Sudanese withdrawals become a new source of conflict?

Hey everyone!

This will be a shorter post than usual, because it is more of an addition to my previous ones than a completely new aspect. As I was reading more about the issues surrounding the GERD, I noticed a point that came up several times (Cascao, Tawfik & Zeitoun, 2019, Heggy et al., 2021, Wheeler et al., 2020), and that I had not considered before: the potential increase in water withdrawals from Sudan due to the GERD, and the impact it might have on Egypt further downstream.


Indeed, as Heggy et al. explain, Sudan will benefit more from the GERD than Egypt because the dam regulate the flow of the Nile, enabling Sudan to increase its irrigated areas for example, and overall use more Nile water (up to 32 bcm annually according to current estimates) . As a reminder, Sudan is currently allocated 18.5 bcm annually, whereas Egypt gets 55.5 bcm, according to the 1959 agreement. However, Sudan currently does not use all of its share, which leads to Egypt using more than its share. While this situation is not problematic at the moment, I believe that it could quickly become a new point of tension between the downstream riparian countries, if Sudan starts withdrawing its allocated resources and potentially asking for more (or simply taking more?) as a result of the GERD.



Alfalfa crop in Sudan with Pivot irrigation, ICS


I was therefore quite surprised that, although these three papers mention the issue, it is not truly taken into account in their subsequent analysis. Indeed, Wheeler et al. consider different scenarios for the GERD filling and later operation, under normal and drought conditions, but do not add as a condition the potential increase in withdrawals from Sudan, as well as withdrawals from Egypt above the 55.5 threshold. Cascao, Tawfik & Zeitoun make an interesting addition to this point by highlighting the interest from several external actors, such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar, to invest in Sudan’s largely underexploited arable land (18 million ha currently cultivated out of 105 million ha of arable land). 


In light of this information, I believe that Nile water withdrawals from Sudan is a crucial issue that has not yet received enough attention, as Egypt and Ethiopia’s more mediatised conflict has come under higher scrutiny. 

Comments

  1. Clement25 November 2021 at 13:53

    So this will be one comment covering the last three posts, where the focus has been the GERD and you have presented interesting perspectives about the subject of water and politics but also the ever shifting relation of power across the countries involved. The posts are well writtend and presented with good engagemen with literature. What are the local implication of evolving water sharing structure (75%/25%) between Sudan and Egypt? Will there be more transboundary issues between Egypt and Sudan going forward? Also, does Sudan stand to subvert Egypt agricultural productivity position in the region?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Water and Politics in Africa29 November 2021 at 14:49

      Thank you for all the comments Clement. I do believe that there will be more transboundary issues between Egypt and Sudan, related to water or not. The first one that comes to my mind is the territorial conflict over the Halayib triangle. However, Sudan and Egypt have been allied for many years and I believe that Egypt values this partnership, especially in order to counter Ethiopia on the GERD matter.
      Regarding the local implications, which you also mentioned in your previous comment, I have to say that I don't know much about them, and I doubt that I will be able to make a specific post about it, but it is definitely a very interesting aspect that I will try to learn more about.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lecture by Dr Marina Ottaway: a historical perspective on Nile water management

Image
Today, I attended a lecture by Dr Marina Ottaway, as part of UCLA’s webinar series ‘Nile River Basin in Crisis’, and wanted to share my thoughts about it. She mostly focused on the historical context and the impacts of political developments in Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia, which I thought would be a very relevant topic for my second post. What struck me in her lecture, is that all three countries were mentioned separately, as if they were not interdependent in the past. And in a way, it is true. Egypt has kept full control over Nile waters since its independence. Current allocation of water between Egypt and Sudan is still based on an agreement negotiated in 1959 , which only allowed them a share of 25% of Blue Nile water, while the other 75% goes to Egypt. However, as Dr Ottaway explained, this never led to major tensions between them, because Sudan was unable to use its share of the water anyway (due to a lack of technical capacity and a reliance on rain-fed agriculture). Colonial remn...
Read more

Why is the GERD such a conflictual project?

Image
  Map of the Nile basin showing major infrastructure, with active reservoir storage volumes shown for each location, ( Wheeler, K.G., Jeuland, M., Hall, J.W. et al, 2020 ). It is interesting to note that the expected reservoir storage volume for the GERD has increased from 14 to 74 bcm . Hello everyone! After having a look at the historical relations between Egypt Sudan and Ethiopia, I wanted to understand why the GERD specifically is such a controversial project. Indeed, it is far from being the first dam on the Nile, and will probably not be the last. So what are Egypt's, Ethiopia’s and Sudan’s positions on the issue? There are many expected benefits and risks of the GERD, for all three countries involved. For Ethiopia, it is clear that the production of electricity through the dam will boost the economic development of the country. Indeed, the dam will produce more than 6,000 megawatts , which Ethiopia intends to use, but also to export, as part of its strategy to become an ener...
Read more