Lecture by Dr Marina Ottaway: a historical perspective on Nile water management



Today, I attended a lecture by Dr Marina Ottaway, as part of UCLA’s webinar series ‘Nile River Basin in Crisis’, and wanted to share my thoughts about it. She mostly focused on the historical context and the impacts of political developments in Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia, which I thought would be a very relevant topic for my second post.


What struck me in her lecture, is that all three countries were mentioned separately, as if they were not interdependent in the past. And in a way, it is true. Egypt has kept full control over Nile waters since its independence. Current allocation of water between Egypt and Sudan is still based on an agreement negotiated in 1959, which only allowed them a share of 25% of Blue Nile water, while the other 75% goes to Egypt. However, as Dr Ottaway explained, this never led to major tensions between them, because Sudan was unable to use its share of the water anyway (due to a lack of technical capacity and a reliance on rain-fed agriculture). Colonial remnants also play a part. Indeed, Egypt had hoped that Sudanese territory would remain under its control after the British had left. While this did not happen, Egypt did keep a strong influence over Sudan, at least as long as Gamal Abd-el Nasser was in power (until 1970). 


Ethiopia also did not become a major player in the region before the 1990s. According to Dr Ottaway, Selassie’s main focus was not economic development, and while the location of a possible dam on the Blue Nile was always clear, it did not become a serious project until 1991 and the accession to power of Meles Zenawi and the Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF). Ethiopia indeed sees the dam as a huge opportunity to develop itself through the production and export of hydropower, while countering Egyptian hegemony. On the other hand, Egypt feels threatened by the dam, as it would give Ethiopia power over 90% of the water it uses.


Another very interesting point was the differentiation Dr Ottaway made between irrigation dams (which lead to water being taken out of the river) and hydroelectric dams (which do affect the quantity of water available). As the GERD is a hydroelectric dam, it should not have such a major impact on the river flow downstream on the long term. The main issue for Egypt and Sudan is therefore the initial filling of the reservoir, which will significantly impact the flow. 


The main questions for me at this point therefore are: what will actually be the impact of the dam for all three countries? What cooperation efforts have been made so far and why have they failed? What can Egypt actually do now that the dam has been built? Who are the other actors involved in this conflict and what is their influence?

Comments

  1. Clement25 November 2021 at 12:49

    Nice summary of the lecture, and the questions you have come up with are very important.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Water and Politics in Africa29 November 2021 at 14:43

      Thank you, I hope my future posts provide some answer to these questions!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is the GERD such a conflictual project?

Image
  Map of the Nile basin showing major infrastructure, with active reservoir storage volumes shown for each location, ( Wheeler, K.G., Jeuland, M., Hall, J.W. et al, 2020 ). It is interesting to note that the expected reservoir storage volume for the GERD has increased from 14 to 74 bcm . Hello everyone! After having a look at the historical relations between Egypt Sudan and Ethiopia, I wanted to understand why the GERD specifically is such a controversial project. Indeed, it is far from being the first dam on the Nile, and will probably not be the last. So what are Egypt's, Ethiopia’s and Sudan’s positions on the issue? There are many expected benefits and risks of the GERD, for all three countries involved. For Ethiopia, it is clear that the production of electricity through the dam will boost the economic development of the country. Indeed, the dam will produce more than 6,000 megawatts , which Ethiopia intends to use, but also to export, as part of its strategy to become an ener...
Read more

Can an increase in Sudanese withdrawals become a new source of conflict?

Image
Hey everyone! This will be a shorter post than usual, because it is more of an addition to my previous ones than a completely new aspect. As I was reading more about the issues surrounding the GERD, I noticed a point that came up several times ( Cascao, Tawfik & Zeitoun, 2019 , Heggy et al., 2021 , Wheeler et al., 2020 ), and that I had not considered before: the potential increase in water withdrawals from Sudan due to the GERD, and the impact it might have on Egypt further downstream. Indeed, as Heggy et al. explain, Sudan will benefit more from the GERD than Egypt because the dam regulate the flow of the Nile, enabling Sudan to increase its irrigated areas for example, and overall use more Nile water (up to 32 bcm annually according to current estimates) . As a reminder, Sudan is currently allocated 18.5 bcm annually, whereas Egypt gets 55.5 bcm, according to the 1959 agreement . However, Sudan currently does not use all of its share, which leads to Egypt using more than its s...
Read more